At the beginning of 2024, a group of sensible, decent, likeable people met in Potsdam, the Düsseldorf Forum, to responsibly discuss, among many other things, how to slow down the arrival of migrants to Germany who abuse our right of asylum. These were exactly the same issues that are being discussed today by the old parties so that they don’t lose all their voters.
Red/green intriguers had the meeting spied on by a group with the arrogant name “Correctiv” and maliciously defamed the participants. They then used this meeting as an opportunity to incite people in Germany and MOB-ilize them into staged large-scale demonstrations in several cities, with the help of our synchronized press. Parallels were even drawn with the Berlin “Wannsee Conference” of 1942. In Bautzen, among other places, demonstrators against the “Potsdam Conference” were transported to and from the conference by train – but it was claimed that it was Upper Lusatia that stood up against right-wing extremism. What a bunch of lies!
However, the lies of the left-wing activist network Correctiv were disproved long ago. Both “Correctiv gGmbH” (Hamburg District Court 324 O 61/24) and its managing director David Schraven (Hamburg District Court 324 O 166/24) were each ordered to cease and desist from making untrue factual claims. Media that had recklessly taken “Correctiv’s” predatory story at face value, such as the ARD/NDR-Tagesschau (Higher Regional Court Hamburg 7 W 78/24), the ZDF-Heute-Journal (Hamburg District Court 324 O 439/24) or the SWR (Hamburg District Court 324 O 465/24), were also ordered to cease and desist. Today, the Correctiv activists’ campaign can therefore not only be described as “dubious” (Berlin District Court II, 27 O 293/24 eV), but also as a “dirty Corrective lie” (Berlin District Court II, 2 O 296/24 eV).
The Federal Republic of Germany finds itself – not by fate, but due to decades of wrong political decisions – in a deep multiple crisis today. It must be possible to discuss solutions in an open and unprejudiced manner, especially among the key players. They cannot and must not subject themselves to the discourse rules and speech bans of left-wing activists, many of whom have never worked productively themselves, but instead spend their lives spying on ordinary citizens right into their private lives in the manner of a political police force in communist states and implementing “subversion measures” against those who think differently.